Dyreex Midnight 1.25 (22kg) x Pro Kennex Black Ace 300
Powerful. Great on the backhand side.
Baseline: on this low-powered frame, I actually found very easy depth and at first, I had several forehands sail long. Even when hitting with moderate swings, depth came easy driving and slicing from both sides. The rackets small sweet-spot and high swing weight, got me tired each time after 1 hour of straight hitting.
Forehands: elastic feel from the stringbed with significant dwell time. Much better results when hitting the relatively small sweet spot using top-spin rather hitting flat. The moderate comfort rating was given for the sake of the rather high demanding swingweight of the racket, so this combo wasn't a comfortable experience for me. Slight misshits still gave easy depth (almost no shots fell short), but erratic consistency.
Backhands: this was the best part of this playtest. On both 1hbh and 2hbh, it worked absolutely great. Somehow these flatter shots were hit better than my flat forehands. Slices had very easy depth with minimal need of bodyweight transfer.
Netplay: for sure the most powerful driving and blocking volleys I've hit so far with the less effort needed.
Conclusions: With this rather demanding racket with an open 16*19 pattern, I found that Midnight was elastic-powerful even with moderate swings. Had to hit with topspin to get consistency on the forehand side. On the other hand, I had no issues on the backhand side. So, for rackets similar specs to this one that have a larger sweetspot by nature, I'd suggest trying it 2kg higher full-bed.
Comfort: 4 (racket's small sweetspot and high swing weight)
Stiffness: 4
Power: 5
Ball pocketing: 5
Spin: 5
Feel: 4 (inconsistency on the forehand side)
* Quick-fire thoughts after 3 hours of hitting. I will play 1 more hour most probably tomorrow and then that's it as I'm parting ways with this racket.
I noticed minimal string movement and very slow snapback in the sweetspot area.
Reference string: Luxilon Alu Power Rough, strung 2-3kg higher (played 3 hours).
Powerful. Great on the backhand side.
Baseline: on this low-powered frame, I actually found very easy depth and at first, I had several forehands sail long. Even when hitting with moderate swings, depth came easy driving and slicing from both sides. The rackets small sweet-spot and high swing weight, got me tired each time after 1 hour of straight hitting.
Forehands: elastic feel from the stringbed with significant dwell time. Much better results when hitting the relatively small sweet spot using top-spin rather hitting flat. The moderate comfort rating was given for the sake of the rather high demanding swingweight of the racket, so this combo wasn't a comfortable experience for me. Slight misshits still gave easy depth (almost no shots fell short), but erratic consistency.
Backhands: this was the best part of this playtest. On both 1hbh and 2hbh, it worked absolutely great. Somehow these flatter shots were hit better than my flat forehands. Slices had very easy depth with minimal need of bodyweight transfer.
Netplay: for sure the most powerful driving and blocking volleys I've hit so far with the less effort needed.
Conclusions: With this rather demanding racket with an open 16*19 pattern, I found that Midnight was elastic-powerful even with moderate swings. Had to hit with topspin to get consistency on the forehand side. On the other hand, I had no issues on the backhand side. So, for rackets similar specs to this one that have a larger sweetspot by nature, I'd suggest trying it 2kg higher full-bed.
Comfort: 4 (racket's small sweetspot and high swing weight)
Stiffness: 4
Power: 5
Ball pocketing: 5
Spin: 5
Feel: 4 (inconsistency on the forehand side)
* Quick-fire thoughts after 3 hours of hitting. I will play 1 more hour most probably tomorrow and then that's it as I'm parting ways with this racket.
I noticed minimal string movement and very slow snapback in the sweetspot area.
Reference string: Luxilon Alu Power Rough, strung 2-3kg higher (played 3 hours).
Kommentar