Mehr Einfluß für die Spieler bei ATP-Tour-Entscheidungen: Eure Unterschriften gefragt

Einklappen
X
 
  • Zeit
  • Anzeigen
Alles löschen
neue Beiträge
  • tennisfan08
    Neuer Benutzer
    • 20.05.2008
    • 17

    #16
    Der Artikel ist vom Mittwoch, ich komme aber im Moment wegen Wasserschaden-Drama weiterhin leider nicht dazu, regelmäßig zu diesem Thema beizutragen. Und es ist ein englischer Artikel (tut mir leid), aber ich finde es gut und wichtig, was McEnroe da sagt.

    http://www.tennisweek.com/news/fulls...newsid=6614448

    McEnroe Blasts ATP
    By Richard Pagliaro
    Wednesday, July 23, 2008

    He is the son of a successful New York City attorney who recalls the argumentative skills he would display for years on the ATP Tour were rooted in family debates over the dinner table. Once tennis' raging rebel armed with a Dunlop racquet and a distinctive edge for persuasive argument, John McEnroe has grown into a voice of reason — at times — for the game and is again using his voice to target what he perceives as power abuse by the ATP.

    The man who made little secret of his disdain for tennis authorities during his prime has not exactly mellowed with age when it comes to his feelings for the ATP Tour leadership. McEnroe castigated the ATP as "an absolutely deplorable union...one of the worst unions I can imagine" and called on on the players to step up and seize more power in shaping the future direction of the sport.

    The 49-year-old New Yorker said the core of the current anti-trust lawsuit filed by the Tennis Masters Series Hamburg against the ATP centers on control of the schedule and he urges prominent players taking a greater role in constructing the calendar.

    "Well, as you may or may not be aware, there's a lawsuit, starting yesterday, with pretty much that very thing, that the very core of the issue is trying to change the schedule," McEnroe told the media in Newport Beach last night where he played doubles and mixed doubles for the New York Sportimes, who edged the Newport Beach Breakers 17-15 in overtime. "The schedule is too long. Players have to put their feet down. That's the bottom line. They have to decide these players of today, if they have the right leadership, which is obviously the ATP has been an absolutely deplorable union as far as I'm concerned, one of the worst unions I can imagine. If they had proper leadership it would go a long way towards improving our sport, I believe, to hopefully bridge the gap with the players of today and players that were around like myself and a business person that would the type the thing that would be needed for this to be taken care of in a way that would be beneficial for tennis."

    A long-time critic of the ATP dating back to his playing days, McEnroe said since the season is too long, players should be able to create their own schedules without mandatory appearances and suggested the ATP, which was originally created by players as their union, has lost sight of its original mission. McEnroe charges players' power in the decision-making process has diminished dramatically over the ATP's more than three-decade history and that there is a collusive relationship between tour power brokers and some tournaments creating an "old boys network" that benefits those tournaments at the expense of the players.

    "Not everyone is going to be happy when you make decisions. As far as I'm concerned, players should be allowed to play where they want," McEnroe said. "They should not be told where to play. There's too many tournaments, so why do you have to tell them to play? It's politics, is what it is. These people are in bed with these people with the ATP, these tournament guys, I'm not going to mention names, and because it's so obvious I don't need to mention the name. It's like an old boys network. Why do they get it? There's plenty of other people that are chomping at the bit, I hope. We'll see. So far in 30 years virtually nothing has changed except the players have less power than they had when I was playing, which to me makes no sense whatsoever. Players should have more power, not less power."

    The man who developed his skills under the guidance of Australian Davis Cup coaching legend Harry Hopman at the Port Washington Tennis Academy has been critical of the USTA's failure to fully develop the National Tennis Center at Flushing Meadows — home of the U.S. Open — as a national training development center and has told Tennis Week in prior interviews that what he perceived as the USTA's lack of support in backing a McEnroe-led junior player development program was one factor that led to his resignation as U.S. Davis Cup captain after only one year on the job.

    Reiterating his desire to develop junior players in New York, McEnroe has long said he hopes to help coach New York-area juniors in the future. In May, younger brother Patrick McEnroe assumed his post in the newly-created position of General Manager, USTA Elite Player Development, as part of a new strategic direction for the development of future American champions. The Hall of Famer questioned where the USTA's resources have been going for player development and suggested creating a competitive environment for elite juniors at the NTC is a good starting point to promote player development.

    "Have a tennis academy at the National Tennis Center near where I grew up, have training facilities where all the kids have to play against each other similar to what we did in the old days. There's so many things that I would rather leave it at that for the moment," McEnroe said. "I don't know where all the dollars have been going. Obviously coaching is important, but you should take a look at some of the other places where it's been more successful, obviously. Just because someone was hungry and was in the middle of a war zone in Serbia doesn't mean that that's the only way to get a champion in tennis. Look at Federer and Nadal; I mean, they come from Mallorca and Switzerland. Those are two perfectly good upbringings, and they're the best players in the world, incredible players. So someone found something inside of Nadal that is remarkable. And try to get better athletes in our sport."

    Kommentar

    • tennisfan08
      Neuer Benutzer
      • 20.05.2008
      • 17

      #17
      ET hat es vorgezogen, seinen Rückzug zu verkünden, bevor der neue Spielerbeirat Federer, Nadal, Djokovic und die neuen Spielerrepräsentanten ihn vor die Tür setzen. Einen Tag bevor die Wahl von Ivan Ljubicic in den ATP Vorstand verkündet wurde, hat ET seinen Rückzug bekannt gegeben

      http://www.atptennis.com/1/en/2008ne...s_decision.asp
      ATP PRESS RELEASE
      London, England

      August 21, 2008
      Etienne de Villiers To Step Down As ATP Executive Chairman
      http://www.atptennis.com/1/en/2008ne...icic_board.asp

      August 22, 2008
      Ljubicic Elected To ATP Board
      The ATP Player Council on Friday elected Ivan Ljubicic to the vacant position of European Player Board Representative. He will fulfill the existing term that ends in December 2009. (...) The 29-year-old Ljubicic, who served as vice-president and president of the ATP Player Council in 2006-07, has eight career ATP titles. He reached a career-high No. 3 in the South African Airways ATP Rankings on May 1, 2006 before finishing the season No. 5.
      Das ist dann also die aktuelle Konstellation im ATP Vorstand:
      http://www.atptennis.com/en/aboutatp/organization.asp
      Board of Directors
      Tournament Representatives
      » Zeljko Franulovic
      » Charlie Pasarell
      » Graham Pearce
      Player Representatives
      » Justin Gimelstob
      » Ivan Ljubicic
      » Iggy Jovanovic
      ET ist also raus, dennoch mache ich mir immer noch ziemliche Sorgen über die Zukunft der ATP Tour. Denn die Änderungen, die ET durchgedrückt hat, sind durch und die hinterläßt er der Tour, auch wenn er geht, u.a. die neuen Kalender für die nächsten drei (!) Jahre

      http://www.atptennis.com/1/en/2008news/calendars.asp
      ATP PRESS RELEASE
      New York, NY, U.S.A.
      August 28, 2008
      ATP Unveils 2009, 2010 & 2011 Tour Calendars
      For first time ATP releases a three year calendar of events
      Und in der Nachfolge-Gerüchteküche gibt es auch die Idee, ATP- und WTA-Tour zusammenzufassen und ob das den Spielern (und Spielerinnen) mehr Einfluß verschafft, glaube ich nicht

      In den Medien werden John McEnroe Senior und Larry Scott als mögliche ET Nachfolger gehandelt, im Folgenden ein Artikel mit dem Brief, mit dem McEnroe Senior sich beworben hat:
      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle4601844.ece

      August 24, 2008
      Neil Harman
      The Net Post: John McEnroe for President
      The Net Post is back after a three week hiatus in which time the tennis world has been blessed with remarkable stories. Rafael Nadal became the Olympic champion on top of his many wonders at Wimbledon and the French Open, Elena Dementieva won the women's gold medal for Russia and tossed away her bridesmaid's attire, Roger Federer jigged about like a demented man when he won doubles gold for Switzerland with Stanislas Wawrinka, Andy Murray won a Masters Series title in Cincinnati, his first. Maybe we should holiday more often.

      And last but by no means least, Etienne De Villiers, the executive chairman and president of the ATP decided to stand down from his twin posts, just when he looked to have positioned the men's governing body where he wanted it.De Villiers gave a farewell speech to the players at Flushing Meadows on Saturday which was brief and to the point, the reaction to his announcement was polite. No tears were shed, by all accounts.

      And so who is next for the hottest seat in the sport? Might this be the time for the twin governing bodies of tennis, the ATP and the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour to seriously consider becoming one and promoting Larry Scott, the chief executive of the women's tour and a former ATP politico, to take command of both entities. It would be controversial but worth considering, even if the men may find it hard to swallow what might be construed as a takeover.

      De Villiers, a former Disney executive (something certain players never allowed him to forget) is likely to find himself a plum job somewhere else in sport - my money is on a role in the vibrant but confused world that is international cricket - but will remain in his post until the end of the year so there is not a vacuum into which the new man/woman would have to step.

      John McEnroe has not been slow in suggesting it is time for a Tennis Commissioner of tennis i.e. him along the lines of the US PGA golf tour, and John McEnroe, the Net Post learns, has applied for the ATP post. Not junior, but senior. The 73-year-old patriarch of the McEnroe clan - who used to carry in his suit pocket the British tabloid cuttings about his son he did not like and brandish them in the writers' face when they crossed paths - has let it be known that he would like to be considered for the role. He has written the following letter to administrators, agents and players, including Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer, the No.1 and No.2 players in the world.

      It reads....

      Gentlemen: As you all probably know, I am the father of John, Mark (my "normal son," the lawyer) and Patrick McEnroe. I have met some of you at various tournaments, Davis Cup ties, etc.

      To get promptly to the point, I am interested in succeeding Etienne de Villiers as Chairman of ATP Tour, Inc. I am strongly of the view that the best interests of men players, particularly the top ranked players, have been very badly served by Mr de Villiers, to put it mildly, and by his predecessors.

      The rules for participation on the Tour are an abomination. My own view is that NO player should be required to play in ANY TOURNAMENT if he doesn't wish so to do. Also, as long as a player's ranking entitles him to entry, he should be able to enter any tournament without requiring a minimum of tournaments each year. This is a position I have held for over thirty years.

      You are all too young to remember that, in the early 1980s, I represented the "quintessential quintet" (Bjorn Borg, Jimmy Connors, Vitas Gerulaitis, McEnroe (John) and Guillermo Vilas), in negotiations with the Men's International Professional Tennis Council ("MIPTC") over newly proposed rules. Those rules included proposed "hard designations" by the MIPTC for the top hundred players on the ATP computer. You will not be surprised that the QQ were not happy with that proposal. We were able to negotiate an arrangement whereby the QQ and the Council agreed in advance what the "designations" would be.

      I am aware that the Mercedes-Benz international sponsorship of the Tour ends at the end of this year and will not be renewed. As your new Chairman, it would be a major priority of mine zealously to work to find a new sponsor. Also, I would work diligently to find opportunities to monetize various aspects of the Tour in order to ensure its financial foundation is solid.

      Additionally, I have represented John and Patrick in connection with all of their legal needs. This includes all of their broadcasting contracts with BBC, NBC, CBS, ESPN, Tennis Channel and Australia's Channel 7, agreements with respect to special events, endorsement agreements with Nike, Dunlop, Wilson, Snauwert, Sergio Tacchini, etc., not to mention a myriad of endorsements for companies not directly involved with tennis, book contracts and so on. I know and have interfaced with all the constituencies in professional tennis for many years.

      Finally, I am currently Of Counsel to the internationally recognized law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison LLP, where I practiced commercial law since 1967. From 1974 through 2000, I was a partner in the Corporate Department.

      I would be most pleased to meet in person at a convenient time and venue (the US Open site?) with any or all of you, your agents and anyone else you deem appropriate. Please feel free to call or e-mail me with any questions, comments or suggestions you may have. Thank you all in advance for your consideration of this proposal.

      Sincerely,

      John P. McEnroe

      For what it's worth, the Net Post thinks it is all rather a marvellous idea. And, after all, the leader of the free world may be about to elect as a President someone McEnroe's age.
      http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/59949

      From the U.S. Open New York City
      Daniel Kaplan

      Published September 08, 2008 : Page 03
      (...)
      NET GAIN FOR ATP: The ATP board of directors approved placing the tour’s logo on nets at the tour’s 63 events next year. The controversial move was spearheaded by outgoing Executive Chairman Etienne de Villiers.

      “The board approved in principle the on-court net branding plan with the final implementation details to be decided in due course,” a spokesman said.

      U.S. Tennis Association officials declined to comment on the decision, but the USTA has vehemently opposed the plans since they were first broached earlier this year, fearing the net logos would impinge on the brand of the summer U.S. Open Series.

      In a concession, the ATP will shrink the size of the logo from previous mockups and will allow top players one last chance to practice with it and voice concerns, a source said.
      (...)
      SCOTT NOT INTERESTED: Larry Scott, the chief executive of the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour, has been approached by ATP executives inquiring about his interest in taking over the men’s tour, but he said he is not interested. Scott is not ruling out interest in ultimately assuming control of both organizations, but a merger of the two seems unlikely on such short notice, with ATP chief de Villiers announcing his resignation just last month, effective in December.

      One tea leaf to watch would be if the ATP decides to split the jobs of chairman and chief executive. If that were to happen, it’s possible the ATP could hire a CEO and name Scott chairman while he continues in his current post.

      Despite media attention to a letter John McEnroe Sr. sent to the ATP about his interest in the job, he is not considered a serious contender. In fact, when asked about McEnroe’s proposal to eliminate requirements for players to compete in certain tournaments, Scott responded that it ran counter to everything he has heard from sponsors, broadcasters and tournaments.
      Mehr Artikel dazu hier:
      http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/ ... /index.htm
      September 08, 2008
      Gender Blender
      As equal-opportunity events like the U.S. Open show, a merger would benefit both the men's and women's tours
      L. Jon Wertheim
      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/sp...cenroe.html?em
      September 3, 2008
      Patriarch of McEnroe Clan Says He Is Ready to Serve
      By HARVEY ARATON
      Mehr Info zu Larry Scott:
      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... 8B63&fta=y
      TENNIS; WTA Names New Chairman
      Published: March 30, 2003
      Die Interessen von ITF, ATP Management, TV Sendern und Werbepartnern sind gut vertreten. Ich fürchte, wenn es nur noch eine gemeinsame Tour gibt, geraten Spieler (und Spielerinnen) noch mehr unter die Räder. Und mir hat u.a. das Trauerspiel gereicht, dass es dieses Jahr im Semifinale der US Open gegeben hat, als blinde Gier nach Einschaltquoten und Werbeeinnahmen dazu geführt hat, das CBS die Startzeiten der Matches diktiert hat - Ich hoffe, sie haben entsprechend viel Geld verloren, als die geldgieregen Pläne im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes ins Wasser gefallen sind
      Aber sowas ist nicht gut für die betroffenen Spieler und den Tennisport insgesamt.
      Ich denke weiterhin, dass es das Wichtigste ist, dass die Spieler selber mehr Einfluß haben. Deshalb: wer die Petition noch nicht unterschrieben hat, kann das noch tun

      Kommentar

      • tennisfan08
        Neuer Benutzer
        • 20.05.2008
        • 17

        #18
        Und nochmal ein englischer Artikel zum Thema.

        http://msn.foxsports.com/tennis/stor...-turning-point

        ATP has reached a crucial turning point
        by Matt Cronin
        October 7, 2008

        Just as its board of directors is interviewing candidates for its CEO and Chairman positions, the ATP Tour got smacked in the head with a dour possibility.

        Roger Federer may not play the rest of the year.
        Regardless of the tour's rules when it comes to pullouts, the super-wealthy Federer may choose to incur hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and skip not only this week's tournament in Stockholm — where he announced the possibility of shutting down for the season — but also the required upcoming Masters Series tournaments in Madrid, Paris and the season-ending Tennis Masters Cup in Shanghai.

        "(This) has been a tough year for me as I was always playing catch-up after being diagnosed with mononucleosis at the beginning of the year," Federer said. "I feel fortunate to be healthy again, but I want to remain at the top of the game for many more years to come and go after the No. 1 ranking again. In order to do that, I need to get a proper rest and get strong again so that I am 100 percent fit for the remainder of the year or next year. At this point, I am not sure when I will be ready to play again, but I hope to be back at some point before the end of the year."

        Whether the great Swiss will be able to get motivated again and make it back in the next five weeks is hard to tell, but what's easy to determine is that tennis is cycling through the same problems it has always had when it comes to its stars: how to convince them to play mandatory events when they are earning so much more off-court.

        Federer — who is said to have earned $35 million in 2007, only $10 million of that in prize money — contends his main goals are to break Pete Sampras' all-time Grand Slam mark of 14, lead his country to a Davis Cup title and win the French Open. While grabbing back No. 1 from Nadal would surely be satisfactory, it's not going to happen this year as the Spaniard would have to fall completely on his face and not reach another quarterfinal and Federer would have to win every tournament he enters.

        By the end of the Madrid tournament, which begins next week, Nadal will likely be holding up the year-end No. 1 award. It would just about cap off a tumultuous year for the tour, which saw its top players revolt against their own player representatives, throwing them off the board and pushing out tour CEO and Chairman, Etienne de Villiers. De Villiers has handed in his resignation, which goes into effect at year's end.

        Tour spokesmen are confident that in 2009, when it rolls outs a new calendar replete with big money events, it will flourish behind a corps of players the administration believes have bought into the new schedule and its requirements.

        They had better, or all will be lost. The tour has asked its highest level tournaments to put up increased money in order to guarantee that the top players will show up. if the players balk at the structure — and Federer, Nadal, Novak Djokovic, Andy Murray, Andy Roddick and James Blake did voice opposition at times this year — then the ATP will be hard pressed to ask the tournaments to keep upping their prize money and making further investments in their facilities. Fans want to see the stars and the tournaments want to be able to guarantee them, but if the players don't buy in, it's a fragile house of cards.

        This week alone, there are three sizeable tournaments going on — Stockholm, Moscow and Vienna — which sport combined prize money of $2.4 million. Guess how many of the aforementioned six notables are competing there. Zero.

        But at this point, it looks like most of the players, three of whom (Federer, Nadal and Djokovic) are now on the ATP Players Council, are willing to give next year's structure a try, which will include mandatory appearances at the four Grand Slams, eight Masters Series tournaments (which will be re-named 1000 Series) and the year-end Masters Cup.

        But that does mean that there won't be any tweaking, as all the top players have said that they want a new CEO and Chairman who will listen to their concerns and act on them. If that means dropping a couple so-called "hard designated tournaments" the new hire(s) might be forced to do more than fiddle, unless he or she wants to end up with the same fate as de Villiers.

        There are said to be at least 10 candidates for de Villiers' two positions (the tour is likely to split them up this time rather than have just one man hold them). There are familiar names like Miami tournament director Butch Buchholz, a former player, and former Australian Open tournament director Paul McNamee, who also played on tour, and a couple of current ATP executives.

        McNamee is more than familiar with another candidate, who has yet to be interviewed by the board — John McEnroe Sr., whose son, John Jr., had a 4-1 record against McNamee.

        A lawyer by trade, McEnroe Sr. has been publicly campaigning for the job and has already talked to a few of the top players and their agents about his candidacy. He also sent a letter to all the players discussing his opposition to the current way of doing business. And he has the experience. Back in 1980, he met the head of the then Men's International Professional Tennis Council (the predecessor to the ATP), as the representative of the 'Quintessential Quintet:' Bjorn Borg, Jimmy Connors, Vitas Gerulaitis, John McEnroe Jr. and Guillermo Vilas — the top five attractions at the time.

        "They wanted to hard designate tournaments, too, and were concerned that the top ones wouldn't play them," McEnroe Sr. recalled. "We had a meeting and told them, 'You may call them hard designations, but we are not buying that. What we are prepared to do is that the players will agree among themselves what they will play and we'll spread them across the spectrum. All the top tournaments will get a representative grouping of top players, but you will not select them. The players will assign themselves to particular tournaments. They accepted it. We said, 'We don't care if you call them hard designated or not, but you know and we know that you are not hard designating anything, that we are the ones making the selections."

        That 1980s formula cannot be taken entirely out of the equation, because the reality of the tour over the past decade is that many stars have opted out of Masters Series tournaments that were hard designated, but they preferred not to play. They ate the fines and the loss of ranking points.

        Even though both Federer and Nadal have been stand-up guys for the most part when it comes to fulfilling their obligations, if fans want a clear picture of how seriously some top men take mandated events, take a look at the Monte Carlo or TMS Paris draws since the beginning of the century. Many top men chose not to play them, rules and fines be damned.

        "The rules as they exist now are terrible for the players," McEnroe Sr. said. "De Villiers lost support of the players and tournaments. He was making rules that the players didn't like and he should have never done that. The tour is a car. The engine is the players, the tournaments are the body, and wheels are the sponsors and TV. Without all of them working in concert, the car won't work. But without the engine, the car won't move."

        McEnroe says that he's not interested in blowing the system up, but will listen to what the players want before deciding how many mandated tournaments should be on the books. A CEO with such pro-player sympathies such as McEnroe Sr. may not thrill the tournaments, which according to the tour, will invest $800 million into facilities in the coming years and a record $100 million in 2009 financial commitments.

        In fact, Charlie Pasarell, the influential co-owner of the tournament in Indian Wells, Calif., who has held a board position since the ATP's inception in 1990, just quit his board spot because he was frustrated with the players pushing out De Villiers. Gavin Forbes, a top tennis executive at IMG, who remarkably once led an effort to sell the Indian Wells tournament to China, might take his spot as America's tournament representative.

        ATP spokesman Kris Dent believes the tour is back on its axis, but it still seems to be looking for its footing. Intelligent and forward-looking players such as Federer might hold the key to its success, but only if he's thinking not just of himself, but of the long-term health of the sport.

        "The players should select themselves where they have to go," McEnroe Sr. said. "If they say that everyone goes to every 1000 series, that fine, but I think it's too much and it's the cause of their physical problems. Of course the tournaments put up big money and should be supported. But forget all (that) — the rules are only written for the top five or top 10 and they try to make them play as much as they can without regard to their mental or physical well being. It hurts them long term because they are playing more than they should."
        Ich stimme McEnroe Senior zu. Möge die Macht mit dem gesunden Menschenverstand sein, der in seinen Worten zum Ausdruck kommt

        Kommentar

        • tennisfan08
          Neuer Benutzer
          • 20.05.2008
          • 17

          #19
          Ich habe mir die Tourkalender für die nächsten drei Jahre jetzt mal in Ruhe und genauer angesehen.
          Wer sich das selber ansehen will, hier ist der link zur ATP Seite http://www.atptennis.com/3/en/tournaments/fullcalendar/

          Folgendes habe ich gefunden:

          Abkürzungen:
          H Hard Court IH Indoor Hard Court G Gras CL Clay
          AUSO Australien Open
          RG Roland Garros
          USO US Open
          DC Davis Cup

          H AUSO (14 Jan 2008) 19 Jan 2009 / 18 Jan 2010 / 17 Jan 2011
          +2 Wochen
          IH 500 Rotterdam
          back to back
          IH 500 Memphis
          back to back
          CL oder H 500 Acapulco oder 500 Dubai
          (in 2008: Rotterdam, Memphis, Acapulco, Dubai back to back; Dubai wurde also verschoben, jetzt parallel mit Acapulco)
          DC FR 02 Mar 2009 / 01 Mar 2010 / 28 Feb 2011
          + 1 Woche
          H Masters 1000 Indian Wells
          + 1 Woche
          H Masters 1000 Miami (in 2008 IW und M back to back)
          + 2 Wochen
          CL Masters 1000 MC
          back to back
          CL 500 Barcelona
          back to back
          CL Masters 1000 Rome
          + 1 Woche
          CL Masters 1000 Madrid
          (in 2011 CL Masters 1000 Madrid back to back CL Masters 1000 Rome, Barcelona verschoben und back to back mit MC)
          + 1 Woche
          CL RG
          + 2 Wochen / + 3 Wochen / + 3 Wochen
          G Wimbledon
          + 1 Woche
          DC Quarterfinal
          + 2 Wochen
          CL 500 Hamburg oder H Indianapolis
          + 2 Wochen / + 1 Wochen / + 2 Wochen
          H 500 Washington
          back to back
          H Masters 1000 Montreal
          back to back
          H Masters 1000 Cincinnati (2008 folgte hier Olympia ab 11. Aug)
          + 1 Woche
          H USO
          + 1 Woche
          DC Semifinal
          + 2 Wochen
          H 500 Beijing oder H 500 Tokyo (2008 IH Madrid, Europa!)
          back to back
          IH Masters 1000 Shanghai (2008 kein Masters in Asia im Herbst)
          + 2 Wochen
          IH 500 Basel oder IH 500 Valencia
          back to back
          IH Masters 1000 Paris
          (+ 1 Woche in 2008) + 1 Woche/ 2010 und 2011 back to back !
          (2008 Masters Cup Shanghai 10 Nov 2008) IH ATP Finals London 22 Nov 2009 / 14 Nov 2010 / 14 Nov 2011
          (+ 1 week in 2008) + 1 Woche / + 2 Wochen / + 2 Wochen
          (2008 DC Final 17 Nov 2008) DC Final 30 Nov 2009 / 29 Nov 2010/ 28 Nov 2011


          Das hat mich so wütend gemacht, dass ich einen wütenden offenen Brief an die ATP geschrieben habe, der jetzt auf sportingo online ist:

          http://www.sportingo.com/tennis/a106...isgrace-tennis

          Dear ATP officials,

          This is an angry open letter to you. I am angry because of the tour calendars for 2009, 2010 and 2010. In your press release (August 28, 2008) you claim that the new tour calendar introduces and “ensures a healthier schedule for players, with less travel across continents and less congested sections of the season".

          However, one look at the new calendar shows the season is as long as ever, starting with the first Grand Slam in January and ending with ATP Tour finals (and DC finals) late in November. There will be a lot of back-to-back events. In 2008 the Olympic Games were said to be the reason for moving dates of tournaments and having so many back-to-back events. In 2009-2011 there will be no Olympics, so why all the back-to-back tournaments?

          Plus, the Masters 1000 Paris will be back to back with ATP Tour finals in 2010 and 2011. All this contradicts your press release saying that there will be less congested sections of the season. Additionally, from 2009 on players will be forced to go to Asia in fall to attend the new Masters 1000 Shanghai. Again, this contradicts your press release saying that there will be less travel across continents.

          I am sick and tired of the PR hooey that you try to sell to the public. Etienne de Villiers, the executive chairman of the ATP Tour, will be leaving at the end of the year. But that is no solace because the damage to the calendars has been done.

          I am also angry because you claim in the same press release that the “ATP will next season introduce a new brand look and identity based on extensive consumer research designed to make the tour more fan friendly. The changes, the largest since the tour’s inception in 1990, follow more than two years of analysis, consultation and extensive consumer research of more than 20,000 fans globally”.

          I really would like to see this consumer research. Actually I will only believe that there has been such research when I see it. I find it funny that tennis fans themselves express a very different opinion about how the tour should be run, contradicting your so-called consumer research.

          In a poll on FOXSports.com, tennis fans were asked whether the ATP should require players to compete in their tournaments. Of more than 1,800 votes, a huge 70 per cent said no, it should be left up to the players whether they take part or not.

          Also, more than 2,900 fans signed an online petition to support ATP players' demand for more influence in ATP decisions and changes to the ATP tour and calendar. I started the petition and I informed you of it by sending letters to ATP executive offices in London three times. And three times I got no answer. I have the funny feeling that you ignore fans when we do not hold the opinion that best fits into your business plan.

          I do not believe that you want to make the tour more fan-friendly. And I do not believe a single word about "extensive consumer research" that you claim to have done. You just say so to shut up critics. As I see it you have made a big mess out of the coming tour calendars. I want you to own up to it and not to hide behind sayings like “fans want it that way”. Do you dare to publish your “research” so we can all check whether it fulfils standards and stands review and tests?

          Begging your pardon, but I feel very strongly that only blind greed is behind the changes introduced to the ATP Tour and calendar. You do not care one bit about fans and you care even less about the health of the players and tennis as a sport.

          Do not get me wrong, I know that pro tennis is big business and I am fine with people wanting to make money from it - as long as this is not done at the cost of players’ health and doesn't interfere with the sport as happened this year with a lot of players having to withdraw or retire because of exhaustion or injury, with the tournament in Rome being hit the hardest. And as also happened at the US Open, where semi-final matches were scheduled by the TV broadcaster who did not want the games to start simultaneously in order to make more money from it – regardless of the very bad weather forecast.

          We all could watch in horror the resulting unfair mess (I do hope they lost a good sum of money from it). I would love to stand corrected in all the points that I have been listing here - and I would love to read what “20,000 fans globally” have been asked and what they answered.

          I'm very much looking forward to your answer explaining exactly why and where I am wrong, and what exactly is so very fan-friendly about the new tour and exactly how the new calendars “ensure a healthier schedule for players, with less travel across continents and less congested sections of the season".
          Ich bin so sauer wie die ATP rumlügt. Vor allem aber mache ich mir Sorgen um die Gesundheit der Spieler. Das können die Spieler auf Dauer nicht aushalten.

          Kommentar

          • tennisfan08
            Neuer Benutzer
            • 20.05.2008
            • 17

            #20
            allen einen schönen 1. Advent!

            In den letzten Wochen habe verschiedene Journalisten das Thema zu lange Saison/zu viele Turniere aufgegriffen, ich bin nur nicht dazu gekommen, das zu posten. Ein deutscher Artikel war auch dabei:

            http://www.welt.de/welt_print/articl...das-Beste.html

            Nur die Reste statt das Beste
            Beim Masters-Cup in Shanghai beweisen acht Tennisprofis unfreiwillig, wie chaotisch und überfordernd die Jahresplanung ihrer Bosse ist

            Von Jörg Winterfeldt
            14. November 2008, 02:32 Uhr

            Berlin - Amerikaner pflegen ihr Selbstbewusstsein auf der Zunge zu tragen, auch Andy Roddick glänzt gern damit. Wenn dem besten Tennisprofi der Nation etwas stinkt, wie der enge Terminkalender und die Überbeanspruchung der Spieler, formuliert er das unmissverständlich: "Der Scheiß", sagt er, "muss ein Ende haben."

            Den Beweis lieferte er beim Masters-Cup in Shanghai eindrücklich: Mit einer Knöchelverletzung reiste er nach dem ersten Spiel heim nach Austin in Texas und ließ sich von dem gegen 50 000 Dollar Gage aus den Ferien in Thailand eingeflogenen Tschechen Radek Stepanek ersetzen. Der ist zwar nur Weltranglisten-27., aber vor ihm qualifizierte Stars verzichteten auf ihr Nachrückrecht. "Uns wird zuviel abverlangt, wenn wir elf Monate im Jahr spielen sollen", klagt Roddick, "und 2009 zwingen sie uns zu noch mehr Pflichtturnieren."

            Die 1988 von Profis im Protest als eigene Interessenvertretung organisierte Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) schlittert gerade in die schwerste Krise. Durch die Integration der Turnierveranstalter und die Wahrung weiterer Interessen, sind die Spieler völlig in den Hintergrund geraten. Als Konsequenz forschen die Vorstände der ATP gerade in Shanghai nach einem geeigneten Nachfolger für den für den Schlamassel zuständigen Boss Etienne de Villiers aus Südafrika. "Ich respektiere Andys Meinung", sagte Vorstandsmann Brad Drewett, "aber die ATP berücksichtigt die Standpunkte all ihrer Anteilseigner und glaubt, dass dieser Weg in die Zukunft der richtige ist."

            Im Ringen um den kommerziellen Erfolg fällt es der ATP schwer, Turnierveranstalter und deren Sponsoren so rüde hinauszuwerfen wie sie es mit dem Deutschen Tennisbund getan hat, indem sie dessen Topturnier kurzerhand den Masters-Status aberkannte. Wenn DTB-Chef Georg von Waldenfels am Wochenende im Amt bestätigt werden will, hängt ihm der diplomatische samt dem folgenden juristischen Flop vor einem US-Gericht bilanzschädigend an. Eine Milliarde Dollar soll an Investitionen 2009 in den ATP-Turnierbereich fließen. Dafür braucht es sehr viele Turniere und die Pflicht für Spieler, bei den vier Grand-Slams, acht Turnieren der ersten und vier weiteren der zweiten Kategorie anzutreten.

            Dabei ist Roddicks Beweislage durchaus erdrückend: Der Branchenbeste Rafael Nadal ließ sich in Shanghai von vornherein wegen einer Knieverletzung vom Franzosen Gilles Simon ersetzen. Roger Federer kam so ermüdet nach China, dass er prompt zum Auftakt auch gegen Gilles verlor. Dass er trotz Übelkeit und Bauchschmerzen überhaupt aufschlug, beruhte im wesentlichen auf seinem untadeligen Charakter zum Wohle der Ehrenrettung der Veranstaltung: Die Chinesen, die das Turnier ab 2009 nach London weiterreichen, haben nie vergessen, dass vor drei Jahren in Roddick, Nadal, Andre Agassi, Lleyton Hewitt und Marat Safin fast alle Stars abgesagt haben.

            Der Serbe Novak Djokovic beschloss gestern, seine Kräfte zu sparen, als der Modus mit Gruppenspielen es gestattete: Weil er bereits für das Halbfinale qualifiziert war, verlor er 6:1, 5:7, 1:6 gegen Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, obwohl ein Sieg ihn bei einer Abschlussniederlage Federers heute gegen den Schotten Andy Murray sogar noch in letzter Sekunde auf Platz zwei der Weltrangliste hätte hieven können. Der Schweizer Federer muss gewinnen, um Djokovic sowie dem Russen Nikolai Dawidenko zu folgen, der den Argentinier del Potro 6:3, 6:2 besiegte.

            Ersatzmann Stepanek, der heute auf Simon trifft, war eh nur auf ein gutbesoldetes Miniintermezzo eingestellt: Anders als der zweite Ersatzmann Nicolas Kiefer, der trotz der Kurzfristigkeit mit professioneller Einstellung angereist ist als Nummer 37 der Welt ("Ich bin ja kein Hobbyspieler"), musste Stepanek sich von den Kollegen komplett ausrüsten lassen - Schläger von Djokovic, Socken von Murray, und Kontaktlinsen besorgte ihm auch einer.
            Und einige englische Artikel, zu denen ich nur die Links poste:

            http://www.monstersandcritics.com/ne...ad_of_the_ATP_

            Blake blasts injury-inducing workload of the ATP

            Nov 1, 2008
            http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis ... ennis.html

            Rafael Nadal's absence from Shanghai signals growing problem for ATP Tour
            By Mark Hodgkinson in Shanghai
            Last Updated: 5:37PM GMT 11 Nov 2008
            http://livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/11 ... ls_Roddick

            Don't like it? Don't play, ATP chief tells Roddick
            14/11/2008 7:02:00 AM. | 0
            http://www.tennistalk.com/en/news/20...9_ATP_Schedule
            2009 ATP Schedule
            11/25/08 7:05 AM | Jonathan Morgan
            http://www.theherald.co.uk/sport/headli ... s_sake.php
            Calendar congestion must be addressed for everyone’s sake
            ALAN MACKIN
            November 27 2008

            Die große Frage ist: wer kommt nach ET?

            http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/60662

            ATP trims prospects for top post
            By DANIEL KAPLAN
            Staff writer
            Published November 24, 2008 : Page 05

            The ATP earlier this month whittled its list of candidates for the group’s top job down to about six executives, sources said, but one of the leading internal candidates, Andy Anson, resigned shortly after making the cut.

            The ATP board of directors at its meeting in Shanghai, China, tabbed several internal candidates to possibly replace Etienne de Villiers, who is leaving the men’s tennis body at year’s end after 2 1/2 tumultuous years. Anson, a former Manchester United marketing director and the head of ATP Europe, was one of those candidates, sources said, but he abruptly resigned last week to run England’s quest to host the 2018 World Cup.

            One of the top outside candidates is former Tour de France chief Patrice Clerc, who also has run the French Open. Clerc was ousted last month as head of Amaury Sport Organisation, which runs the Tour, among other events. It’s unclear precisely why he left Amaury.

            Removed from consideration for the ATP slot at the board meeting, at least for the time being, were former Australian Open executive Paul McNamee and American tennis executive Butch Buchholz, sources said. McNamee said he was unaware he is no longer a contender. A spokeswoman for Buchholz, chairman of the Sony Ericsson Open, said he similarly has not been informed.

            With Anson’s departure, the leading ATP insider candidates are Mark Young, head of the Americas, and Brad Drewett, head of the Asia-Pacific region, sources said.
            [text to photo: Andy Anson (left) is out of contention for the post after leaving as head of ATP Europe.
            Brad Drewett (right), head of the ATP’s Asia-Pacific region, remains a leading insider candidate.]
            “We have great internal candidates we have complete confidence in,” said board representative Justin Gimelstob, “and they are all being reviewed.” He declined to comment on specific candidates.

            The board is not yet certain what job, or jobs, it is hiring for. The preference, sources said, is to have an executive chairman, taking the same title de Villiers has. The board could also split the position between a chairman and CEO, at which point candidates such as Buchholz and McNamee could come back into the picture. The board would like to choose a candidate by the end of the year, but there appears to be a chance the decision could move into the new year.

            The board in Shanghai also received updates on replacing Mercedes-Benz as the tour’s top sponsor. This summer, the tour was talking to several companies, including Aviva, about taking over that sponsorship role, but insurance and automobile prospects have receded with the global economy in such poor health, and the tour now is talking to Abu Dhabi, the second largest city in the United Arab Emirates.

            The talks with the Middle Eastern Gulf city to become the tour’s top sponsor are at an early stage.

            The ATP also formally approved plans to place the group’s logo on all nets beginning by the end of January. The U.S. Tennis Association has resisted that initiative out of fear the logos would detract from its U.S. Open Series.

            Mit ist es lieber, der ATP Vorstand nimmt sich (diesmal) die nötige Zeit, um einen (oder zwei) Kandidaten zu finden, die den Job dann auch richtig gut machen. Und das heißt für mich eben auch, die Gesundheit der Spieler und Tennis als Sport zu berücksichtigen, das bringt dann - meines Erachtens - auch den finanziellen Erfolg der Tour

            Kommentar

            • tennisfan08
              Neuer Benutzer
              • 20.05.2008
              • 17

              #21
              Leider keine deutschen Quellen zum Thema im Moment, aber es könnte nächste Woche schon eine Entscheidung geben:


              http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?sec ... id=3736262

              Inside Tennis
              The ATP appears closer to naming a replacement for outgoing CEO Etienne de Villiers, and this time the tour must get it right. Ubha
              [teaser mit link zu folgendem Artikel]


              http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis ... id=3728815

              Short list of candidates being considered for the ATP's top spot

              By Ravi Ubha
              Special to ESPN.com
              November 26, 2008

              Justin Gimelstob was a tad bemused as he discussed the search for the most powerful official in men's tennis.
              Gimelstob has been inundated with requests to divulge info relating to Etienne de Villiers' replacement when the South African ends his tumultuous 2½-year reign as head of the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) next month. Depending on who you listen to, there could be more than a half-dozen serious candidates.

              "Well, I'm glad the sports world has this kind of an interest in tennis," Gimelstob said in a phone interview. The flamboyant former serve-and-volleyer is a player representative on the ATP's board of directors.

              De Villiers spent 15 years in a variety of senior executive roles at The Walt Disney Company prior to his appointment as the ATP's executive chairman and president; harsh critics may suggest he ran the tour like Mickey Mouse.

              The mighty Roger Federer and world No. 1 Rafael Nadal pounced on De Villiers for restructuring the game, which included downgrading Germany's Hamburg Masters. Federer, Nadal and a majority of top-20 players reportedly signed a letter in the spring demanding his contract not be renewed until others were interviewed, and De Villiers announced he'd be leaving in August, about two weeks after a court in Delaware cleared the ATP of wrongdoing in demoting the Hamburg tournament.

              According to a story published in the SportsBusiness Journal on Nov. 24, citing unidentified sources, the ATP this month narrowed the field to six. One, it said, was Andy Anson, the ATP's CEO of Europe who has since resigned to lead England's bid to host soccer's World Cup in 2018.

              The leading insider candidates are Brad Drewett, head of the international group, and Mark Young, head of the Americas, while a top external possibility is former French Open head Patrice Clerc, the article added.

              A source within the ATP told ESPN.com that, to the best of his knowledge, the three were indeed being considered.

              Gimelstob didn't name names, so he didn't comment, either, when asked if Larry Scott, WTA chairman and formerly the ATP's COO, was in contention. Others have been linked with the post, including: John McEnroe Sr.; Arlen Kantarian, the USTA's outgoing CEO of professional tennis; and Butch Buchholz, chairman of the Sony Ericsson Open in Miami.

              Scott reportedly said during the U.S. Open that he wouldn't consider the job unless he had a position allowing him to oversee both bodies. Under his stewardship, the WTA Tour has flourished financially, aided by a six-year deal worth $88 million with title sponsor Sony Ericsson. Scott couldn't be reached for comment.

              The ATP's official line?

              "The intention now is for the board to progress the recruitment process with a short list of candidates over the next few weeks," spokesman Kris Dent said. "The board will announce further details in due course."

              In an e-mail, Nick Bollettieri, arguably the most successful tennis coach in history, said De Villiers' successor has to be a "great businessperson" and "great promoter."

              "There are a lot of great candidates out there, internally and externally," Gimelstob said. "It's not an easy search to find someone who satisfies the numerous criteria we're looking for. I think we've put in a yeoman's effort in trying to do it. There are going to be people disappointed, which is understandable."

              Gimelstob, incoming player rep David Egdes and Iggy Jovanovic, gone as a rep when the year ends, discussed the issue in detail at the recently completed Masters Cup in Shanghai, China.

              Gimelstob met with Federer and world No. 3 Novak Djokovic, but was quick to point out other subjects were on the agenda.

              Wanting more of a say, Federer, Djokovic and Nadal ran for (and were elected to) the player council in the summer. They pass on ideas to the player reps.

              "I think it's one of those things where you want to move quickly but not hurry," Gimelstob said. "The important thing is to get the decision right as opposed to get it done. I think that's the sentiment. It's a great time in the sport, that we have the players engaged and supportive of the process and involved in it. This is a job that can be done and will be done successfully."
              http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/60723

              De Villiers’ salary reaches $1M

              Daniel Kaplan
              Published December 01, 2008 : Page 03

              Outgoing ATP Executive Chairman Etienne de Villiers earned $1 million last year, up 33 percent from 2006, and total compensation at the tour rose 10 percent to $9 million, according to the group’s tax return filed with the Internal Revenue Service late last month.

              The pay increase for the tour came as it lost $1 million for the year, a sum not nearly as sizable as the annual loss for the WTA. Both tours have been spending money to restructure their schedules, but the WTA, unlike the ATP, spreads new sanction income over 10 years, resulting in a higher initial loss.

              In 2006, de Villiers earned $764,000.
              The principal expense for the ATP was a $4.4 million legal bill tied to the unsuccessful lawsuit that the tour’s Hamburg, Germany, event filed in 2007 against the circuit. A jury ruled in favor of the tour this summer, and the ATP has since filed claim in federal court to recover its legal expenses from the tournament.

              Total expenses rose to $61.3 million in 2007 from $47.6 million in 2006. At the same time, revenue rose to $60.3 million from $53 million. These figures reflect money at the governing body level and not the financials of the 63 events that comprise the ATP, other than the season-ending championship.

              The ATP board is meeting in New York next week to interview the final candidates to take over for de Villiers, who is resigning at the end of this month.

              ----------------------------
              Top ATP salaries in 2007

              Name Position Amount

              Etienne de Villiers Executive chairman $1 million
              Philip Galloway COO $495,275
              Mark Young General counsel/CEO of the Americas $475,287
              Brad Drewett Head of Asia $475,275
              Richard Davies CEO, ATP Properties $635,769
              Phil Anderton CMO $485,087
              Andre Silva Chief player officer $265,275
              Andy Anson Head of Europe $379,442
              Gayle Bradshaw EVP $255,275
              Iggy Jovanovic Director $140,178

              Source: ATP Form 990 for 2007


              ... "and this time the tour must get it right" hat Ravi Ubha geschrieben - und mir damit aus der Seele gesprochen

              Kommentar

              • tennisfan08
                Neuer Benutzer
                • 20.05.2008
                • 17

                #22
                Bin heute auf zwei Artikel von Tom Tebbutt aufmerksam geworden. Tut mir leid, wieder Englisch und die Artikel sind beide ziemlich lang, deshalb poste ich die nur links. Lang aber sehr lesenswert, wie ich finde

                http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...tory/WBTennis/

                Nomenclature nonsense
                Tom Tebbutt
                December 1, 2008 at 8:24 PM EST
                http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...Story/WBTennis

                ATP marketing guru responds
                Tom Tebbutt
                December 11, 2008 at 12:32 PM EST
                Und das ist der Mann, der Tom Tebbutt geantwortet hat, Information von der offiziellen ATP Seite:
                http://www.atptennis.com/en/aboutatp/organization.asp

                Phil Anderton
                Chief Marketing Officer

                The ATP announced in March 2006 that Phil Anderton had been named the organization’s Chief Marketing Officer. Anderton, who will work alongside ATP Executive Chairman and President Etienne de Villiers in London, will be responsible for driving strategy, maintaining standards and managing the ATP brand worldwide.

                Anderton most recently served as Chief Executive Officer of the Scottish Premier League’s Heart of Midlothian Football Club, and prior to that worked with the Scottish Rugby Union as CEO as well as Commercial & Marketing Director. During his tenure with the Scottish Rugby Union, Anderton delivered record income and interest levels in rugby via new sponsorships, TV deals and ticket revenue.

                While at Heart of Midlothian in 2005, Anderton delivered success on- and off-field following an overhaul of players and management. The 2005 squad played superbly (including a best-ever season start) and a new business plan resulted in a successful launch of a stadium project. With the Scottish Rugby Union from June 2000 through the start of 2005, Anderton created a winning culture highlighted by a four-year strategic plan that accelerated the development of young players, restructured the sport and improved its financial standing.

                Anderton worked at the Coca-Cola Company from 1993-2000, where he served as the Division Marketing Director of Central Europe, a Coca-Cola Global Brand Manager when he was based in Atlanta and the Marketing Manager of Diet Colas Great Britain. Anderton graduated with a degree in Management Studies with International Relations from St. Andrews University.

                Phil is a critical component in our plan to revitalize the ATP for everyone involved in our sport, but first and foremost the fans,” said de Villiers. “Phil’s experience and knowledge will help us turn the ATP into a world-class marketing organization rather than just a governing body. He’s got the passion needed to drive strategy, maintain standards and establish the ATP brand so it delivers for players, tournaments and sponsors. It’s great to have him on board.”
                Ich bin zum einen sehr glücklich mit den beiden Tom Tebbutt Artikeln, weil er der ATP eine Liste von begründeten Kritikpunkten um die Ohren haut, die Anderton mit seiner Antwort nicht entkräften kann.

                Stocksauer bin ich über die Antwort von Anderton: er wiederholt die ewig gleiche PR-Leier, ohne konkrete Fakten zu nennen. U.a. reitet er wieder darauf rum, dass Fans das alles so wollen. Ziemliche Frechheit das.

                Genauso wie Tom Tebbutt finde ich es sehr schwer zu glauben, dass so viele Fans angeblich zu dämlich sind, um Tennissport und ATP Tour zu verstehen. Dass heißt: ich glaube es definitv nicht, außer die ATP veröffentlicht die Umfragen, so dass geprüft werden kann, wer befragt wurde, was genau gefragt wurde etc.

                Tom Tebbutt kritisiert auch, aber eben nicht nur, dass mal wieder alles umbenannt wird. Tom Tebbutt weist die ATP auf Fehler in der Vergangenheit hin, die jetzt wiederholt werden (sollen) - und Anderton/die ATP weigert sich, dass zur Kenntsnis zu nehmen.

                Ich bin nicht so milde in meinem Urteil über ET und die ATP Manager: Wer Fehler macht und nicht aus ihnen lernt, nicht aus Ihnen lernen will, dem unterstelle ich keine guten Absichten ("Your boss, the about to retire Etienne de Villiers, made mistakes but I think most of us in the tennis media think he was honorably intentioned. I believe that you and your fellow ATP executives are also working for the best for tennis") Oh nein, wer so hartnäckig an seinen Fehlern festhält, der macht das absichtlich und bewußt.

                Und was ist bis jetzt dabei rumgekommen - an "Erfolgen"?
                Vor allem Erfolge für die Manager selber:
                http://www.monstersandcritics.com/sp...on-dollar_man_

                De Villiers to leave ATP a million-dollar man
                Dec 6, 2008, 8:51 GMT

                New York - Outgoing ATP boss Etienne de Villiers will exit the organisation at the end of the year as a million-dollar man after salaries in the exective row were revealed by an American trade publication.

                The Sports Business Journal reported that the South African whose reign atop the game for the past three years has been controversial, earned 1 million dollars (785,000 euros) in 2007, up one-third from his 2006 salary.

                Filings to US tax authorities obtained by the publication also showed that salaries in the executive suite rose by 10 percent in 2007 as the worldwide financial crunch began to bite. (...)
                ET hat sich eine Gehaltserhöhung um 33 % gegönnt, alle anderen bekamen 10 % mehr.
                Und wie ging und geht es der ATP währenddessen?
                http://www.tennistalk.com/en/news/20...llar_paycheck/

                De Villiers cashes a million dollar paycheck
                12/10/08 7:50 PM | Kelli DeMario

                Departing ATP Executive Chairman, Etienne de Villiers, earned a cool million in salary last year, a 33 percent increase from 2006.

                The pay increase follows a million dollar revenue loss for the tour during the past year. In order to control sanction costs and ensure its financial viability in the future, the ATP organization continues to spend a sizeable fortune retooling the tour calendar.

                The ATP suffered a four-and-a-half million dollar setback this year, resulting from an unsuccessful lawsuit filed on behalf of the Hamburg, Germany event. Over the summer, a jury ruled in favor of the ATP, stripping the tournament of its Masters Series status. Following the ruling, tour officials filed a motion requesting full legal remuneration from the tournament.

                Tour expenses increased from approximately $48 million in 2006 to over $61 million in 2007. Although fiscal projections show a 13 percent increase in tour revenue over the last 12 month period, the company was unable to avoid a seven-figure deficit.

                The ATP board plans to meet with a select group of executive chair candidates in New York next week. Final interviews will be conducted to find a replacement for the outgoing de Villiers, who vacates his post at the end of December.
                Da waren sie also kompetent die Manager, sich um ihre eigenen Gehälter zu kümmern.

                Ein neuer Tour-Hauptsponsor, der Mercedes Benz ersetzen soll, ist immer noch nicht gefunden. Und dafür ne Gehaltserhöhung? Und Loblieder auf die prächtige Zukunft, die dem Tennissport angeblich ins Haus steht?

                Und: die Finanzkrise ist da und beeinträchtigt die Weltwirtschaft. Auch das ignoriert Anderton beharrlich in seiner Antwort. Die Tennis-Turniers sind dagegen schon aufgewacht:
                http://www.zimbio.com/pilot?ZURL=%2F...Bbag%2BMore%2B ATP&URL=http%3A%2F%2Ftennisreporters.net%2F

                ATP Tournaments Seek Relief
                MONDAY, DEC. 8

                The world economic recession has struck the ATP Tour. A source told TennisReporters.net that a group of tournament directors has gotten together and asked the ATP for relief next year in the from freezing prize money and were told no. In 2009, most of the tournaments have been asked to significantly up prize money as part of the ATP’s redesigned calendar, but with sponsors hard to come by these days, it’s going to be very difficult for many tournaments to break even. To make matters worse, the ATP has yet to replace its main sponsor, Mercedes, which put at least six figures into the pocket of every event. Whether the tour’s new CEO will change direction on the request is impossible to tell, but whoever that person is will be sure to hear the request again.
                (...)
                Was ET und seine Manager sich da ausgedacht haben, wird nicht funktionieren. Die neuen Kalender für die nächsten drei Jahre sind eine zu hohe Arbeitslast für die Spieler, sie sind in jeder Hinsicht überdimensioniert und eine Blase und diese wird platzen.

                Den einzigen Ausweg, den ich weiterhin sehe, ist dass die Spieler sich ihre Macht in der ATP zurückholen. Zur Erinnerung: die ATP Tour gehört zur Hälfte den Spielern und zur Hälfte den Turnieren. Mit Nadal, Federer und Djokovic im Spielerbeirat und neuen Spielerrepräsentanten im ATP Vorstand sehe ich die Chance. Es ist eine Schande, dass sich die Spieler selber darum kümmern müssen, eigenlich sollte die ATP das ja für sie machen, aber wenn die Manager dort Träumen von einer "world-class marketing organization rather than just a governing body" nachhängen, müssen die Spieler wohl selber ran.

                Ich stimme Tom Tebbutt völlig zu:
                "Sometimes you wish that ATP officials would realize that the personalities of the tennis's superstar players, and the sport itself – as it is played on the court – are the greatest advertisements for the game."
                Und dafür braucht es gesunde Spieler, die nicht 11 Monate im Jahr um den Globus gehetzt werden oder ansonsten Strafen zu befürchten haben ... kein anderer Sport mutet seinen Akteuren eine solche Arbeitslast und eine solch lange Saison zu. Investitionen und hohe Preisgelder können daran nichts ändern. Es liegt nicht am Geld, irgendwann sind die Spieler alle. Und das durften wir dieses Jahr beobachten und es war kein schöner Anblick, und das wird so weitergehen, wenn die neue ATP Führung nicht auf die deutlichen Warnsignale und guten Gegenargument hört und es nicht verhindert.

                Die Petition ist übrigens noch offen, wer noch unterschreiben und die Spieler unterstützen will, kann das noch tun
                Zuletzt geändert von tennisfan08; 12.12.2008, 15:46.

                Kommentar

                • tennisfan08
                  Neuer Benutzer
                  • 20.05.2008
                  • 17

                  #23
                  Weiterhin leider keine deutschsprachigen Nachrichten zum Thema:

                  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle5380711.ece

                  Justin Gimelstob says ATP head must be true all-rounder

                  From The Times
                  Neil Harman, Tennis Correspondent
                  December 22, 2008

                  Justin Gimelstob is remarkably energetic at 5.30 on a New York morning, having just arrived home for Chanukkah and its eight days of enlightenment and celebration. From there, he will fly to Australia and what he expects will be another celebration, that of the choice he and his fellow ATP board members have made for the man to lead men’s professional tennis into a defining era.

                  The American, who turns 32 next month and was once tagged the most quotable player in the men’s game, has had to learn to become a good listener as he sits in judgment on the candidates vying to replace Etienne de Villiers, the former Disney executive, who announced in August that he would be stepping down as the ATP’s executive chairman and president at the end of the year. It is a role that not only needs to be redefined but demands the full range of sporting wiles.

                  Gimelstob retired from the tour last year, having reached a career-high singles ranking of No 63, and has since mixed TV commentary and political manoeuvring. Having been denied in his first attempt to join the ATP board, he was voted on as a player representative at Wimbledon last summer and is driven to provide those he only recently faced across the net with a leader who will not let them down in a job that requires the patience of Job.

                  He says that the list of candidates, both from within tennis and other sports, has been “incredible”. The choice is expected to be confirmed before the Australian Open starts in Melbourne on January 19. “It has been like a crash course in things you never learnt at Harvard Business School,” Gimelstob said. “I have met the most amazing people in this process, in which I have felt a huge responsibility to look after the interests of the game and particularly the players.

                  “We have the top guys all engaging, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic are on the Player Council, they feel they are better represented and that has to be imperative. The person who gets this job will have the best opportunity, the best skill-sets, the finest capabilities of anyone else in the major sports of the world. There are a lot of changes required, it’s going to be tough in the current economic downturn so we need someone with political, commercial, management and communication skills.”

                  The inside track has suggested a present member of the ATP executive taking over and Gimelstob admits to being “incredibly impressed” by the internal staff, the pick of whom is Brad Drewett, the Australian who has been in charge of their international office.

                  There has been a decent shout, too, for Adam Helfant, a 43-year-old graduate of Harvard who has spent the past 13 years with Nike, rising to the post of corporate vice-president. Nadal and Federer, who both wear its apparel, might like the sound of that.

                  Allen ein Frohes Fest und schöne Feiertage

                  Kommentar

                  • tennisfan08
                    Neuer Benutzer
                    • 20.05.2008
                    • 17

                    #24
                    Die Petition ist jetzt geschlossen, siehe auch entsprechenden Hinweis auf der Petition Seite:

                    http://www.petitiononline.com/tennis08/petition.html

                    This petition is now closed. I wrote to ATP (to Etienne de Villiers and to Adam Helfant) and to Player Council about it, last try was in February 2009. I am sorry to say: No answer, no one even bothered to confirm that the letters and e-mails have been received. Those are the manners of ATP officials and the much acclaimed fan friendliness of ATP. – Many thanks to everyone for helping with the petition and for signing the petition. Tennis fans rock! 04 April 2009

                    Danke an alle, die hier gelesen, beigetragen und diskutiert haben.
                    Danke an alle, die unterschrieben haben.

                    Ich wünschte, „Yes, we can“ würde auch im Tennis funktionieren.
                    Wir haben es jedenfalls versucht

                    Viele Grüße und die besten Wünsche an alle hier.
                    Ich verabschiede mich hiermit und sage: Tschüß!

                    Kommentar

                    Lädt...